From time to time, I ruminate about the relationship between common sense and the ADA. It might be when cogitating about whether showing up for work is an essential function of a job. Or when pondering whether a bridge worker with agoraphobia is a qualified individual with a disability. In framing arguments on such issues

 To what extent may an employer deny a requested accommodation because of on an employee’s poor performance which is caused by a disability? 

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York denied an employee’s request to telecommute or to relocate his office to a different Fed building because the employee had been rated as “below standards” in

“It depends,” according to the U.S. Department of  Justice. “Some individuals with food allergies have a disability as defined by the ADA–particularly those with more significant or severe responses to certain foods. This would include individuals with celiac disease and others who have autoimmune response to certain foods, the symptoms of which may include difficulty

We haveposted previously about the ADA’s “accommodation of last resort”: when an employee cannot perform the essential functions of his or her position, with or without an accommodation, due to a disability, an employer must consider transferring the employee to a vacant lateral or lower position for which the employee is qualified.

Whether a