California          The sick leave landscape is constantly evolving, and the City of Los Angeles is no exception to that rule. This past month the City of Los Angeles Office of Wage Standards (“OWS”) revised its rules and regulations (“Revised Rules”) as well the FAQs regarding its Minimum Wage and Paid Sick Leave Ordinance (the “Ordinance”).  As reported on our website (click here), the City’s Ordinance originally was effective July 1, 2016. The OWS has now provided further clarification regarding several issues as detailed here:

Exempt Employees

           The FAQs clarify that the Ordinance does not apply to “exempt employees.” According to the FAQs, such “exempt” employees include employees who are not “entitled to a minimum wage from any Employer under the California minimum wage law, as provided under California Labor Code section 1197 and wage orders published by the California Industrial Welfare Commission.” The FAQs further specify that such employees, who are not covered by the Ordinance, include exempt “white collar” employees.  Regardless, it remains necessary to provide exempt employees with sick leave under California state law.

Rate of Pay

            The Revised Rules also provide for the same rate of pay requirements as state law. Specifically, employers must either calculate sick leave rate of pay either: (1) in the same manner as the regular rate of pay for the workweek in which the sick leave is used (whether or not the Employee actually works overtime that workweek); or (2) by dividing total wages (excluding overtime premium pay) by the total number of hours worked in the full pay periods during the last 90 days of employment. Previously, the Ordinance, rules, and FAQs were silent on this issue.

Smaller Employers

            Effective July 1, 2017, the Ordinance will apply to employers with 25 or fewer nonexempt Employees working in the City of Los Angeles (in addition to employers with more than 25 Employees, who were covered as of July 1, 2016). The Revised Rules provide that such smaller employers using a front-loading method on July 1, 2017, may provide 24 hours for the period covering July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. Effective January 1, 2018, the employer is required to provide the full 48 hours.

“Reasonable” Requests for Sick Leave

            The Revised Rules also address the requisite notice for requesting sick leave. The originally published Rules provided that an employer could not deny an employee’s request to use sick leave if the employee communicated the request more than one hour before the beginning of the employee’s shift. Under the Revised Rules, an employee need only give notice “as soon as practical, as may occur in the case of unanticipated illness or a medical emergency” or provide “advance notice” for planned absences, such as doctor’s appointments.

* * * *

            These are just some of the issues impacted by the Revised Rules and FAQs. Employers should review their policies to evaluate whether the revisions impact their businesses. Please contact Jackson Lewis if you have any legal questions regarding the Ordinance.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Susan E. Groff Susan E. Groff

Susan E. Groff is a Principal in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She advises and counsels management on various employment related issues and is Co-Leader of the California Advice and Counsel Resource Group.

Ms. Groff advises employers on complying…

Susan E. Groff is a Principal in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She advises and counsels management on various employment related issues and is Co-Leader of the California Advice and Counsel Resource Group.

Ms. Groff advises employers on complying with federal and California requirements for disability accommodation and protected leaves of absence.

She also counsels employers on a host of other employment issues, including wage and hour laws, harassment and discrimination complaints, workplace investigations, reductions in force, and discipline and termination questions. Ms. Groff further conducts training and seminars on employment related issues, including sexual harassment prevention training.

Furthermore, Ms. Groff has extensive experience exclusively representing employers in labor and employment disputes. She has defended employers in employment litigation, including actions involving sexual harassment, discrimination on the basis of sex, age, race, religion, and disability, wrongful termination, and wage and hour matters, including class actions. Ms. Groff has litigated matters from inception through the appellate stage before California state and federal courts and represents employers in proceedings before state and federal administrative agencies and tribunals.

Photo of Benjamin A. Tulis Benjamin A. Tulis

Benjamin Tulis is a principal in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. His practice focuses on advice and counsel within the labor and employment law sector. Ben is a member of the California Advice and Counsel resource group.

Ben counsels…

Benjamin Tulis is a principal in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. His practice focuses on advice and counsel within the labor and employment law sector. Ben is a member of the California Advice and Counsel resource group.

Ben counsels employers on a host of employment issues, including wage and hour laws, leaves of absence, employment-related agreements, incentive plans, independent contractor classifications, exempt/non-exempt classifications, company policies, reductions in force, workplace investigations, employee discipline, litigation avoidance and helping employers address legal developments on the fly as they arise. Ben assists employers with a wide variety of employment-related agreements, including but not limited to employment agreements, confidentiality agreements, commission agreements, incentive plans, contractor agreements, severance agreements, arbitration agreements and various other agreements with employees and third parties. Ben helps employers develop incentive arrangements, including commission arrangements with industry-specific compliance issues.